ZIM Should I Buy
-
$
0.000
0.000(0.000%)
At close0.000(0.000%)Aft-market
ET
Loading...
Not a good buy right now. ZIM just sold off hard (-4.96% regular session) and momentum is weakening (MACD histogram negative and expanding). Options positioning is slightly defensive (OI put/call > 1) with extremely elevated IV, and fundamentals in 2025/Q3 deteriorated sharply YoY. Wall Street remains broadly cautious with multiple Underweight ratings and price targets far below the current ~$22 level, implying limited upside and meaningful downside risk if freight rates normalize. With no Intellectia buy signals today and no near-term news catalyst, the higher-probability move is further consolidation/downside rather than an immediate rebound worth chasing.
Price/Trend: Closed at 22.04 after a sharp down day, sitting below the pivot (22.358) and approaching first support (S1=21.377). A break below S1 increases risk of a move toward S2=20.77. Momentum: MACD histogram -0.0937 and negatively expanding = bearish momentum building. RSI(6)=42.33 = weak/neutral, not yet oversold (no strong mean-reversion buy signal). Moving averages: SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200 is bullish on a trend basis, but today’s drop + bearish MACD suggests the uptrend is losing steam near-term. Levels: Near-term resistance is 23.34 (R1) then 23.95 (R2). For an impatient buyer, the stock is currently positioned closer to support with deteriorating momentum—more consistent with “wait/avoid” than “buy now.” Pattern-based outlook: Similar-pattern stats suggest ~-0.21% next day, +2.53% next week, +9.04% next month, but the immediate tape is not supportive and doesn’t justify forcing an entry.
Strategic review “optionality” noted by Fearnley (upgrade to Hold) could support the stock if actions are value-accretive.
Technically, the stock is near support (21.38–22.00 area), which can attract short-term bounces if buyers step in.
If container rates re-accelerate unexpectedly, ZIM can react quickly due to the sector’s operating leverage.
is well above several bearish price targets ($8.70, $13.
and also above the more neutral $20 target, implying asymmetric downside if macro/industry normalizes.
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3. Growth trend is negative and steep: Revenue fell to $1.777B (-35.73% YoY). Profitability compressed heavily: Net income $123M (-89.06% YoY) and EPS $1.02 (-89.07% YoY). Gross margin dropped to 19.04 (down ~59.66% YoY). This profile signals the freight cycle has turned down meaningfully versus last year, which usually limits willingness to pay up for the stock in the near term.
Recent trend: modest softening/mostly bearish. Fearnley upgraded to Hold (from Sell) with a $20 PT, but Barclays stayed Underweight and only nudged PT to $13.70; JPMorgan stayed Underweight and cut PT to $8.70. Wall Street pros vs cons: Pros: potential strategic review outcomes; possibility of reporting above guidance in near term. Cons: continued caution on 2026 outlook; demand/supply imbalance and rate erosion risk; Red Sea reopening could pressure freight rates; multiple Underweight ratings with targets far below the current price—overall skew is negative.
