VNOM Should I Buy
-
$
0.000
0.000(0.000%)
At close0.000(0.000%)Aft-market
ET
Loading...
BUY now. VNOM is in a momentum up-move (positive/expanding MACD and price pushing into the 42–44 resistance zone) with bullish options positioning (puts relatively low vs calls) and strong hedge-fund accumulation. While the stock is technically overbought (RSI~89) and could chop near resistance, the balance of signals supports taking the position immediately rather than waiting for a cleaner pullback.
Trend/Momentum: Bullish. MACD histogram is +0.537 and expanding, which typically confirms upside momentum continuation. Overbought condition: RSI(6)=89.35 is extremely overbought, implying upside may slow near-term and price may consolidate, but it does not negate the current uptrend. Moving averages: Converging MAs suggest a transition point; combined with positive MACD, this favors a bullish resolution. Key levels: Pivot 39.782. Price (42.66 close) is above R1 (42.235), indicating a breakout/strength zone. Next resistance is R2 at 43.75; a clean push/close above that level would further confirm continuation. Near-term support to watch is 42.235 then pivot 39.782. Pattern-based probability (provided): +0.34% next day, +3.45% next week, +11.83% next month—skewed positive.
Intellectia Proprietary Trading Signals
Institutional flow: Hedge funds are buying aggressively (buying amount +698% QoQ), a strong demand-side tailwind.
Analyst stance remains constructive: Multiple firms keep Overweight/Buy/Outperform ratings despite some target trims.
Corporate narrative (from analyst notes): Transition to a more Permian-focused base and improved financial profile post divestitures is viewed positively for cash available for distribution.
Event catalyst ahead: Next earnings (QDEC
on 2026-02-23 after hours; estimates imply a return to positive EPS (Est. 0.26), which can act as a directional catalyst if delivered/raised.
Technical stretch: RSI(
~89 signals an overbought condition; near-term upside may be capped around 43.75 (R
before consolidation.
Macro/commodity uncertainty: Multiple analyst notes cite a cautious oil backdrop/oversupply concerns, which can pressure energy-linked names.
Recent quarter profitability: Latest reported quarter shows a net loss (could weigh on sentiment if investors focus on GAAP profitability rather than cash return profile).
Analyst targets have been trimmed recently by some firms (e.g., Morgan Stanley 45->44; Barclays 60->54; JPMorgan 43->41), reflecting more conservative commodity decks.
Latest quarter provided: 2025/Q3. Revenue rose to $418M (+99.44% YoY), showing strong top-line growth. However, profitability deteriorated: net income was -$77M (down -257.81% YoY) and EPS was -$0.52 (down -200% YoY). Gross margin dropped to 50 (down -25.12% YoY). Net: growth is strong on revenue, but margins and bottom-line performance weakened materially in the latest quarter.
Recent trend: Ratings remain broadly bullish (Overweight/Buy/Outperform maintained), but price targets have been mixed to lower overall as firms adjusted oil price decks (notably Barclays 60->54; Morgan Stanley 45->44; JPMorgan 43->41), partially offset by upgrades/raises from BofA (43->46) and Wells Fargo (49->51) and Mizuho (51->52). Wall Street pros: (a) Generally favorable ratings, (b) perceived resilient/streamlined Permian exposure and improved cash-return profile, (c) supportive institutional buying. Wall Street cons: (a) Commodity price uncertainty and cautious oil outlooks, (b) target cuts tied to lower forward oil assumptions, (c) latest quarter shows negative earnings and margin compression. Influential/politician trading check: No recent congress trading data available; insider trend is neutral (no significant insider activity last month).
