Loading...
SBXD is not a good buy right now for an impatient investor. Despite mildly bullish short-term technicals, there are no strong proprietary trading signals, no news-driven catalysts, and the latest quarter shows declining profitability with essentially no revenue. The setup looks more like a low-volatility placeholder than an actionable upside opportunity today.
Price is 10.62 (flat on the regular session; -0.28% pre-market) in a tight range around the pivot (10.605). Momentum is modestly positive: MACD histogram is above zero and expanding, and moving averages are bullish (SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200), indicating an upward bias/steady trend. RSI(6) at ~59 is neutral-to-slightly bullish (not overbought). Nearby levels are very tight: support S1 10.571 / S2 10.549; resistance R1 10.639 / R2 10.661—suggesting limited immediate reward-to-risk without a catalyst. Pattern-based projection is mixed: ~40% chance of -0.17% next day, +3.26% next week, and -0.76% next month.
Intellectia Proprietary Trading Signals
Technicals are mildly supportive (bullish moving average stack; MACD improving).
Neutral hedge fund and insider activity suggests no visible distribution pressure.
Short-term pattern model implies some chance of a modest 1-week bounce.
No news in the past week, implying no clear event-driven catalyst.
Very tight support/resistance bands near 10.6 indicate limited near-term upside unless volume/catalyst appears.
Latest quarter shows sharp YoY declines in net income and EPS, undermining fundamental momentum.
No valuation data and no visible analyst/rating/target support in the provided dataset.
No recent congress trading data available (no signal from influential political activity).
2025/Q3 results show weak/declining profitability: revenue listed as 0 (0.00% YoY), net income 637,702 (down 53.86% YoY), EPS 0.03 (down 70.00% YoY). Overall, growth trends are negative on earnings power, with no revenue traction shown in the snapshot.
No analyst rating or price target change data was provided, so a Wall Street pro/con consensus view cannot be verified from this dataset. Based on available information only: pros are mildly improving technicals; cons are lack of catalysts and deteriorating YoY profitability.
