PUMP Should I Buy
-
$
0.000
0.000(0.000%)
At close0.000(0.000%)Aft-market
ET
Loading...
Not a good buy right now. Despite a still-bullish technical uptrend (SMA5>SMA20>SMA200 and MACD positive), the stock is near short-term overbought (RSI_6 ~73.6) and is being weighed down by a fresh, dilutive equity offering priced at $10.00. With no Intellectia buy signals, weak latest-quarter fundamentals (Q3’25 YoY revenue/margins down and EPS negative), and near-term statistical drift slightly negative, the risk/reward for an impatient entry is unfavorable at ~$11.16. I’d stay on the sidelines (hold/avoid new buys) until price stabilizes above ~$11.61 or pulls back closer to ~$10.18–$10.00 support/offer price area.
Trend is still bullish but stretched short-term. Moving averages are aligned bullishly (SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200), and the MACD histogram is above zero and expanding (momentum positive). However, RSI_6 at ~73.6 suggests near-term overbought conditions and increases the odds of a pullback/consolidation—especially after the offering-related sell pressure. Key levels: Pivot 10.894 (near-term line in the sand). Resistance R1 11.606 then R2 12.046. Support S1 10.181 then S2 9.741. Given today’s drop (-3.23%), a failure to reclaim/hold above ~10.89 increases downside risk toward ~10.18/10.00.
Prior analyst enthusiasm around ProPWR/power services and long-duration contracting narrative (including AI data-center-related capacity discussed in prior notes).
Technical trend still upward on multi-MA structure; any reclaim of 11.61 could trigger momentum continuation.
Upcoming earnings (QDEC
on 2026-02-18 pre-market could reset expectations if guidance/contracting improves.
Equity offering (announced 1/26; upsized and priced at $10.00 on 1/
is dilutive and typically caps near-term upside until absorbed; price often gravitates toward the deal level.
Latest reported fundamentals show deterioration (Q3’25 revenue down ~18.6% YoY, gross margin down ~50% YoY, EPS -$0.02), undermining the “buy the dip” case without clearer inflection.
Sector backdrop described as plateauing/pressured upstream spending, which can limit near-term pricing power for services.
No supportive hedge fund/insider accumulation signals (both neutral), and pattern-based forward drift is slightly negative over 1D/1W/1M.
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3. Growth trends were negative: revenue fell to ~$293.9M (-18.55% YoY). Profitability weakened materially: net income was -$2.37M (down ~98% YoY), EPS -$0.02 (down ~98% YoY), and gross margin compressed to ~5.36% (down ~50% YoY). This is a weak setup into the next earnings (QDEC 2025 expected EPS around -0.13), and it makes the stock more dependent on future contracting/cycle improvement rather than current earnings strength.
Recent Street trend tilted more constructive but not unanimous. Key changes: JPMorgan upgraded to Overweight (PT $13 from $7, 2025-12-10); Piper Sandler upgraded to Overweight (PT $16 from $6, 2025-11-03); Barclays raised PT to $11 while staying Equal Weight (2025-12-17). One notable counterpoint: Freedom Capital downgraded to Hold (PT $11, 2025-11-17), arguing much of the upside had been realized. Wall Street pros: visible growth narrative tied to power/contracting and potential cycle improvement. Cons: macro/spending headwinds in oilfield services and limited near-term upside after the run-up—now compounded by dilution from the offering. Politicians/congress trading: no recent congress trading data available in the last 90 days.
