Not a good buy right now: price is breaking below a key support zone with bearish momentum (down ~10% today, weak MACD).
News flow is overwhelmingly negative (multiple class-action/lawsuit announcements), which tends to pressure shares short-term.
Insiders are selling aggressively (selling amount up ~113.68% last month), a poor timing signal for an impatient entry.
Options positioning is bullish-leaning (call-heavy), but it’s not enough to offset the technical breakdown + legal overhang.
Near-term path of least resistance looks lower toward the next support (~15.35) rather than a clean rebound.
Technical Analysis
Trend/Momentum: Bearish. MACD histogram is negative (-0.598) and expanding to the downside, signaling accelerating downside momentum.
RSI: RSI(6) at 33.52 is weak (near oversold), which can allow for bounces, but it’s not a confirmed reversal signal.
Moving averages: Converging MAs suggest indecision, but today’s sharp drop tilts the setup bearish.
Key levels: Current price 17.73 is below S1 (18.038), implying a support break; next notable support is S2 (15.352). Resistance levels above are far (pivot 22.385, R1 26.732).
Pattern-based forward view (similar candlesticks): modest negative bias next week (-0.88%), only slight improvement next month (+1.16%)—not attractive for an impatient buyer.
Activity: Total volume 4,314; volume is 70% of 30-day average (not a spike), but today’s open interest vs average is elevated (133%), suggesting positioning/roll activity.
Volatility: Very high (30D IV ~107.5 vs historical vol ~115.47). IV percentile ~67.84 indicates options are relatively expensive vs much of the past year.
Takeaway: Options traders lean bullish, but the tape is currently bearish; call-heavy positioning can also unwind if price keeps sliding.
Technical Summary
Sell
10
Buy
4
Positive Catalysts
cites valuation after weakness and potential upside risk to coal assumptions.
Neutral/Negative Catalysts
create a heavy sentiment overhang into March 31 lead-plaintiff deadline.
with strong downside momentum; next support not until ~15.
Analyst bear case exists: Goldman Sachs Sell with $16 PT, emphasizing valuation and the need to derisk Brook Mine plus cost/capex concerns.
Financial Performance
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3.
Revenue: 120.996M, down -27.73% YoY (clear top-line contraction).
Profitability: Net income is still negative (-13.308M) though improved YoY; EPS remains negative (-0.22).
Overall: Financial trend reads as weakening operating performance despite YoY improvement in net loss—doesn’t support chasing the stock after a breakdown day.
Growth
Profitability
Efficiency
Analyst Ratings and Price Target Trends
Recent changes:
2026-01-20 Jefferies: upgraded to Buy from Hold; PT cut to $30 from $33 (bullish rating, but reduced target).
2025-12-05 Morgan Stanley: initiated Equal Weight; PT $17.50 (roughly in-line with current price ~17.73).
2025-11-19 Goldman Sachs: initiated Sell; PT $16 (calls current valuation ahead of fundamentals; wants Brook Mine derisking).
Wall Street pros: potential upside tied to coal pricing and the critical minerals/rare earth angle; valuation could look attractive after sharp weakness.
Wall Street cons: meaningful execution/derisking risk at Brook Mine, potential high costs/capex, and valuation skepticism; mixed coverage with a notable Sell rating.
Influential/political trading check: No recent congress trading data available.
Wall Street analysts forecast METC stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for METC is 33.36 USD with a low forecast of 16 USD and a high forecast of 44 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
7 Analyst Rating
Wall Street analysts forecast METC stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for METC is 33.36 USD with a low forecast of 16 USD and a high forecast of 44 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
4 Buy
2 Hold
1 Sell
Moderate Buy
Current: 17.300
Low
16
Averages
33.36
High
44
Current: 17.300
Low
16
Averages
33.36
High
44
Jefferies
Christopher LaFemina
Hold -> Buy
upgrade
$33 -> $30
AI Analysis
2026-01-20
Reason
Jefferies
Christopher LaFemina
Price Target
$33 -> $30
AI Analysis
2026-01-20
upgrade
Hold -> Buy
Reason
Jefferies analyst Christopher LaFemina upgraded Ramaco Resources to Buy from Hold with a price target of $30, down from $33. The firm cites valuation following the recent share weakness for the upgrade. "Upside risk" to coal price assumptions and escalating geopolitical risks relating to critical minerals are positives for Ramaco, the analyst tells investors in a research note.
Morgan Stanley
Carlos De Alba
Equal Weight
initiated
$17.50
2025-12-05
Reason
Morgan Stanley
Carlos De Alba
Price Target
$17.50
2025-12-05
initiated
Equal Weight
Reason
Morgan Stanley analyst Carlos De Alba initiated coverage of Ramaco Resources with an Equal Weight rating and $17.50 price target. The company is developing Brook Mine, a thermal coal deposit that holds rare earth elements and critical minerals, the analyst tells investors in a research note. The firm believes the project could transform Ramaco but says the investment story "needs some developing."
Unlock Full Analyst Thesis, Get the complete breakdown of rating reason for METC