Not a good buy right now: momentum is bullish, but the stock is technically overbought (RSI ~80) with no proprietary buy signals and deteriorating latest-quarter fundamentals.
For an impatient buyer, the current setup is unattractive because upside is likely capped near resistance (around 41.45) while mean-reversion risk is elevated.
Better stance is HOLD/avoid initiating new longs at this level; consider only on a pullback closer to support (~40.36 or ~39.68) if momentum stays intact.
Pattern-based forward odds (from similar candlesticks): modeled 70% chance of +5.59% next day, +4.21% next week, +1.35% next month—bullish, but the overbought RSI makes entry timing poor right now.
Bottom line: growth and profitability trends worsened in the most recent quarter, which undermines the bullish chart for a fresh buy today.
Growth
Profitability
Efficiency
Analyst Ratings and Price Target Trends
No analyst rating or price target change data provided (likely limited/none coverage).
Wall Street pros/cons view cannot be reliably inferred from the dataset; in absence of coverage, the stock will trade more on technicals/liquidity and company-specific financial execution.
Influential/politician activity: No recent congress trading data available in the last 90 days.
Wall Street analysts forecast MAYS stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for MAYS is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
Analyst Rating
0
Wall Street analysts forecast MAYS stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for MAYS is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
