FISV Should I Buy
-
$
0.000
0.000(0.000%)
At close0.000(0.000%)Aft-market
ET
Loading...
["Not a good buy right now: price action and momentum remain bearish (below moving averages, MACD negative and worsening).", "Although the stock is near key support (~59.41) and short-term conditions look oversold (RSI-6 ~27), there is no Intellectia buy signal to validate an aggressive entry.", "Near-term headline/sector sentiment has been damaged by PayPal\u2019s weak outlook and Fiserv\u2019s own \u201cshow-me\u201d narrative, with earnings (Feb 10, pre-market) acting as a high-impact catalyst."]
["Trend/Momentum: Bearish; shares are trading below key moving averages and MACD histogram is negative (-0.908) and expanding lower, indicating downside momentum is still building.", "RSI: RSI-6 at ~27 suggests oversold/washed-out conditions (bounce potential), but oversold alone is not a reversal signal without momentum stabilization.", "Levels: Immediate support S1 ~59.41 (price ~59.7\u201359.95 is sitting on it); if it fails, next support S2 ~57.02. Upside reclaim level/pivot ~63.28; resistance R1 ~67.14.", "Interpretation: This looks more like a fragile \u201cdead-cat bounce zone\u201d than a confirmed trend reversal\u2014good for tactical trading only after momentum improves, not a clean buy-now setup."]
with oversold readings, setting up a potential short-term rebound if selling pressure fades.", "Earnings catalyst (2026-02-10 pre-market) can reset sentiment quickly if execution/guide is better than feared (Street EPS est. ~1.90).", "Prior bullish outlier: Tigress still frames the post-Q3 reset as a buying opportunity (Buy, PT $95), implying some upside case remains if confidence returns."]
["Sector/peer shock: PayPal\u2019s weak outlook triggered reassessment of payments and directly pressured Fiserv, keeping narrative risk elevated.", "Bearish technicals persist (below moving averages + deteriorating MACD), suggesting the path of least resistance is still down until proven otherwise.", "Analyst confidence has weakened materially: multiple Neutral/Equal Weight stances and sharp target cuts point to a \u201ctrust rebuilding\u201d period rather than a near-term re-rating.", "Competitive narrative risk: commentary suggests platform transition/execution issues may allow competitors to take share."]
["Latest reported quarter: 2025/Q3.", "Revenue: $5.242B, +1.2% YoY (slow top-line growth).", "Profitability: Net income $792M, +40.4% YoY; EPS $1.46, +49.0% YoY (strong bottom-line growth).", "Margin: Gross margin 58.7%, down ~4.16% YoY (pressure/investment headwind consistent with \u2018investment year\u2019 messaging).", "Read-through: Earnings power improved, but growth quality is mixed due to slowing revenue and margin compression."]
["Recent trend: ratings skewed to Neutral/Equal Weight and downgrades; price targets have been cut aggressively since late 2025.", "Key moves: Northcoast downgraded to Neutral (Feb 2). Cantor initiated Neutral with $70 PT (Jan 26) citing lost investor trust that may take time to rebuild.", "Targets reduced: B. Riley cut PT to $76 from $105 (Neutral) and cited subdued 2026 outlook/investment needs; Stephens cut PT to $75 (Equal Weight). JPMorgan downgraded to Neutral with $85 PT and framed 2026 as a 'show-me execution year.'", "Wall Street pros/cons summary: Pros\u2014integral distribution footprint and ecosystem importance; potential recovery if execution stabilizes. Cons\u2014execution/trust deficit, investment-driven margin pressure, and below-industry growth expectations in 2026."]
