Not a good buy right now for an impatient trader: upside looks limited (current ~$4.295 vs Street targets ~$4.30–$4.60) while near-term downside risk remains into earnings.
Price is sitting just above key support (S1 ~$4.282); momentum is still weakening (bearish MACD), so a clean bounce is not yet confirmed.
Options market activity is thin (near-zero volume) and doesn’t provide a strong bullish confirmation despite high implied volatility.
Influential/political activity check: no recent Congress trading data available; hedge funds/insiders show neutral activity.
Technical Analysis
Trend/structure: Moving averages are bullish (SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200), suggesting the broader trend is still constructive.
Momentum: MACD histogram is negative (-0.0232) and expanding lower → downside momentum is building short-term.
RSI: RSI_6 ~33.3 (weak/near-oversold zone) → could support a bounce, but it’s not a confirmed reversal signal by itself.
Levels: Pivot ~$4.381 is overhead resistance; price below pivot implies sellers still control the near-term. Support is tight at S1 ~$4.282 then S2 ~$4.22; resistance at R1 ~$4.48 then R2 ~$4.542.
Pattern-based projection (provided): ~80% chance of a small drop next day (-0.68%), but positive bias over 1 week (+9.52%) and 1 month (+14.4%)—suggesting the setup needs short-term stabilization first.
Options Data
Bullish
Open Interest Put-Call Ratio
Bullish
Option Volume Put-Call Ratio
Open interest: calls 138 vs puts 0 → extremely call-skewed, but the absolute level is small.
Volume: 0 today (and low 5D/10D averages), so sentiment signals from options are weak/low-confidence.
Volatility: 30D IV ~96.6 vs historical vol ~21.7 → options are priced very richly; market is pricing significant uncertainty (often seen ahead of events), but this does not translate into a directional buy signal.
IV trend: IV 5D/10D averages (108/116) > current 96.6, implying IV has been compressing recently, but still elevated.
Technical Summary
Sell
4
Buy
8
Positive Catalysts
Earnings catalyst upcoming: Q earnings on 2026-02-26 (pre-market) could re-rate the stock if results/forward commentary improve.
Technical longer-term structure remains positive due to bullish moving-average alignment (supports medium-term recovery if support holds).
One major firm (Morgan Stanley) is Overweight (constructive institutional view).
Neutral/Negative Catalysts
Latest reported quarter showed notable YoY deterioration (revenue, net income, and margin down), which can weigh on confidence into earnings.
EPS: reported as 0 (0.00% YoY as provided) → does not signal improving per-share earnings momentum in the snapshot.
Overall: growth trends in the latest quarter are negative, which makes the stock less attractive for an immediate buy ahead of earnings.
Growth
Profitability
Efficiency
Analyst Ratings and Price Target Trends
Recent trend is mixed:
(2026-01-27) Grupo Santander: downgraded to Neutral from Outperform; price target $4.60.
(2025-12-11) Morgan Stanley: initiated/maintained Overweight; ADR PT $4.30 (raised local target; ADR target implies limited upside from ~$4.295).
Wall Street pros: Overweight call suggests potential medium-term upside if execution improves.
Wall Street cons: downgrade to Neutral and targets clustered near current price indicate limited near-term upside; supports a wait/hold stance rather than an impatient buy.
Wall Street analysts forecast ENIC stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for ENIC is 4.3 USD with a low forecast of 4.3 USD and a high forecast of 4.3 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
1 Analyst Rating
Wall Street analysts forecast ENIC stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for ENIC is 4.3 USD with a low forecast of 4.3 USD and a high forecast of 4.3 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
1 Buy
0 Hold
0 Sell
Moderate Buy
Current: 4.260
Low
4.3
Averages
4.3
High
4.3
Current: 4.260
Low
4.3
Averages
4.3
High
4.3
Grupo Santander
Andre de Mello Sampaio
Outperform -> Neutral
downgrade
$4.60
AI Analysis
2026-01-27
Reason
Grupo Santander
Andre de Mello Sampaio
Price Target
$4.60
AI Analysis
2026-01-27
downgrade
Outperform -> Neutral
Reason
Grupo Santander analyst Andre de Mello Sampaio downgraded Enel Chile to Neutral from Outperform with a $4.60 price target.
Morgan Stanley
NULL
to
Overweight
upgrade
2025-12-11
Reason
Morgan Stanley
Price Target
2025-12-11
upgrade
NULL
to
Overweight
Reason
Morgan Stanley raised the firm's price target on Enel Chile to CLP 80 from CLP 70 and keeps an Overweight rating on the shares, noting that the target raise is driven by a combination of higher operating estimates and a rollout to year-end 2026. The firm also initiated coverage of Enel Chile's ADR (ENIC) with an Overweight rating and a year-end 2026 price target of $4.30.
Unlock Full Analyst Thesis， Get the complete breakdown of rating reason for ENIC
