Not a good buy right now for an impatient trader: the primary trend remains bearish (SMA_200 > SMA_20 > SMA_5) and MACD downside momentum is still expanding.
Price (~0.708 pre-market) is sitting just above near-term support (S1=0.699). That’s a low-quality entry location because a small break can quickly push toward S2=0.638.
Options positioning is call-heavy (bullish tilt), but without an Intellectia buy signal and with weak technicals, the bullish skew looks more like speculation than confirmed reversal.
Momentum: MACD histogram at -0.0057 and negatively expanding = bearish momentum increasing.
RSI: RSI_6 at 25.848 indicates the stock is heavily stretched/oversold, which can create short bounces, but it is not a reversal confirmation by itself.
Levels: Immediate support S1=0.699 (price is very close); below that S2=0.638. Resistance overhead at Pivot=0.796 then R1=0.894.
Near-term probabilistic trend (pattern analogs): modest upside bias (next day +0.37%, next week +2.83%, next month +4.98%), but this is fighting a clearly bearish trend setup.
Options Data
Bullish
Open Interest Put-Call Ratio
Bullish
Option Volume Put-Call Ratio
Open interest: Calls 81,928 vs Puts 17,565 (OI put/call 0.21) = strongly call-skewed positioning.
Volume: Total 773 contracts; puts 184; put/call volume ratio 0.31 = bullish sentiment on the day.
Volatility: IV_30d 125.02 vs historical vol 90.83; IV percentile 65.6 = options are expensive and imply large moves.
Activity context: Today’s volume is ~54% of the 30D average (not a “rush” of fresh flow), while today’s open interest is ~103% of the 30D average (positioning exists, but today’s flow is not extreme).
Technical Summary
Sell
8
Buy
5
Positive Catalysts
can fuel sharp reflex bounces.
was positive (+7.32% YoY).
Neutral/Negative Catalysts
Very high implied volatility (IV ~
often corresponds to unstable price action and makes timing entries harder—especially without a confirmed reversal signal.
Financial Performance
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3
Revenue: 27.03M, +7.32% YoY (growth, but not explosive).
Net income: -0.086M, -99.90% YoY (profitability deteriorated sharply vs prior year comparison).
EPS: 0, -100% YoY (earnings power remains weak in the provided snapshot).
No analyst rating/price target change data was provided, so there’s no evidence of a recent Street-driven sentiment shift.
Wall Street-style pros (general): EV charging is a long-term adoption theme; revenue is still growing; call-skew in options suggests some traders are positioning for upside.
Wall Street-style cons (general): sustained downtrend, weak/unstable profitability metrics in the latest quarter, and no near-term catalyst in the provided news flow—making it hard to justify an immediate buy for a trader who wants results quickly.
Wall Street analysts forecast BLNK stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for BLNK is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
Analyst Rating
0
Wall Street analysts forecast BLNK stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for BLNK is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
Buy
Hold
Sell
0
Current: 0.643
Low
0
Averages
0
High
0
0
Current: 0.643
Low
0
Averages
0
High
0
Barclays
Equal Weight
downgrade
$1
AI Analysis
2025-07-23
Reason
Barclays
Price Target
$1
AI Analysis
2025-07-23
downgrade
Equal Weight
Reason
Barclays lowered the firm's price target on Blink Charging to $1 from $1.50 and keeps an Equal Weight rating on the shares. The firm updated the company's model to reflect changes to industry trends.
Stifel
Stephen Gengaro
Hold
downgrade
$2 -> $1
2025-05-27
Reason
Stifel
Stephen Gengaro
Price Target
$2 -> $1
2025-05-27
downgrade
Hold
Reason
Stifel analyst Stephen Gengaro lowered the firm's price target on Blink Charging to $1 from $2 and keeps a Hold rating on the shares after the company delivered weaker-than-anticipated Q1 results. Despite the "underwhelming results," the service segment continues to improve and the company seems to be making solid progress on the cost front, the analyst tells investors.
Unlock Full Analyst Thesis, Get the complete breakdown of rating reason for BLNK