Not a good buy right now: price is below the key pivot (2.607) with limited upside confirmation and no fresh catalysts.
Risk/reward is unfavorable for an impatient buyer: nearest support (1.763) is close, but resistance and pivot levels are far above current price, implying overhead supply.
With no Intellectia buy signals, no news momentum, and weak/early-stage fundamentals (no revenue), the setup doesn’t justify chasing pre-market strength.
Trend/Momentum: Moving averages are bullish (SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200), suggesting a broader uptrend structure, but momentum is weakening.
MACD: Histogram is slightly positive (0.00141) but positively contracting, indicating upside momentum is fading rather than accelerating.
RSI(6): 43.47 (neutral-to-soft), not showing strong buying pressure.
Key levels: Current pre-market ~1.99 is below pivot 2.607 (bearish positioning). Support S1 = 1.763 (nearby downside risk), resistance R1 = 3.451 (far overhead).
Pattern-based forward bias (from similar candlesticks): next week expectation is negative (-4.59%) and next month slightly negative (-1.67%), which does not support an immediate buy.
Positive Catalysts
can support rebounds if price reclaims the pivot (2.607).
Neutral/Negative Catalysts
No news in the last week: no clear event-driven catalyst to fuel a sustained move.
Momentum deterioration: MACD is positive but contracting; RSI is below midline.
Price remains below pivot (2.607), suggesting the stock is trading in a weaker zone with overhead resistance.
Hedge funds and insiders are neutral (no strong “smart money” tailwind).
Congress trading: no recent data available (no supportive signal from influential political buyers/sellers).
Short-horizon statistical outlook is unfavorable (next-week expected move is negative).
Financial Performance
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3.
Revenue: 0 (no operating revenue base).
Net income: -270,832 (still loss-making).
EPS: -0.02.
Overall: financials reflect an early-stage/mining-exploration profile with limited fundamental support for near-term upside unless a catalyst emerges.
Growth
Profitability
Efficiency
Analyst Ratings and Price Target Trends
No analyst rating or price target change data was provided, so there’s no observable positive Wall Street revision trend.
Pros (typical for microcap explorers): high optionality if a major project/catalyst occurs.
Cons: lack of revenue, ongoing losses, and no recent catalyst/news flow—making it difficult for analysts to justify near-term upside without new developments.
Wall Street analysts forecast AUST stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for AUST is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
Analyst Rating
0
Wall Street analysts forecast AUST stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for AUST is 0 USD with a low forecast of 0 USD and a high forecast of 0 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
