Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Provides Superior Yield and Lower Costs Compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)
Comparison of ETFs: The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) offers lower costs and a higher yield compared to the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL), making it appealing for long-term investors seeking dividend income.
Performance Metrics: Since 2013, SCHD has outperformed NOBL in total returns (253% vs. 216%), primarily due to its higher dividend yield and growth rate, despite NOBL showing slightly better price appreciation.
Portfolio Composition: SCHD holds a diverse portfolio with significant allocations in Energy, Consumer Defensive, and Healthcare sectors, while NOBL has a more concentrated approach with sector caps and equal weighting, leading to a different risk profile.
Market Considerations: Both ETFs may underperform compared to the broader S&P 500 during growth stock bull markets, suggesting they are better suited for more challenging economic conditions where dividend-paying stocks typically thrive.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on SCHD

No data
About the author

Market Rally: The market rally is expanding beyond just tech stocks, indicating a broader recovery.
Dividend-Paying Stocks: Companies like Exxon Mobil, Walmart, Ford, and Coca-Cola are outperforming traditional tech favorites.
Market Reaction: President Trump's threats regarding Greenland are causing fluctuations in the stock market.
Investor Strategies: Despite the market uncertainty, investors have various effective strategies to mitigate risks.
Market Performance: The S&P 500 has experienced three consecutive years of double-digit returns, indicating a strong market performance during this period.
Investment Strategy: Dividend investors are encouraged to explore strategies that can provide more downside protection for their portfolios in light of potential market fluctuations.
Types of Market Crashes: Stock market bubbles can lead to two distinct types of crashes when they burst: sector-specific crashes and systemic crashes.
Sector-Specific Crashes: An example of a sector-specific crash is the dot-com collapse that occurred between 2000 and 2002, which primarily affected technology stocks.
Systemic Crashes: In contrast, systemic crashes impact the entire market, as seen during the financial crisis of 2008-09, where widespread declines occurred across various sectors.
Uniqueness of Bubbles: Each stock market bubble is unique, much like snowflakes, indicating that the circumstances and outcomes of each bubble's burst can vary significantly.
- Trump's Economic Claims: President Donald Trump frequently highlights record stock prices as evidence of his economic success.
- Critique of Dividends: Recently, he criticized dividends, which are a significant contributor to stock market returns.

- Bond Market Performance: The bond market experienced its best year since 2020, surprising income investors who were losing hope.
- Future Outlook: Despite some emerging risks, the outlook for the bond market in 2026 remains positive.










