IEFA, SPYT: Big ETF Inflows
- Biggest ETF Inflows: The SPYT ETF had the largest increase in inflows, adding 150,000 units, representing a 40.0% increase in outstanding units.
- Author's Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on IEFA

No data
About the author


Emerging Markets vs. Developed Markets: The ratio of emerging markets to developed markets stocks has hit a historic low, similar to previous instances in 1988 and 2002, which led to significant outperformance of emerging markets in subsequent years.
Current Investment Landscape: Despite the focus on U.S. tech stocks and the S&P 500, there are emerging opportunities in international stocks, particularly in emerging markets, which have shown strong year-to-date returns compared to their developed counterparts.
Valuation Discrepancies: The current price-to-earnings ratio for the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF is significantly lower than that of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, indicating a potential value opportunity for investors in emerging markets.
Macro Economic Conditions: Evolving macroeconomic conditions, including moderating inflation and declining interest rates, may create a favorable environment for emerging markets, suggesting that a shift in market leadership could be on the horizon.
Comparison of ETFs: The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) offers a higher dividend yield (3.5%) compared to the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 2.9%, while SCHF has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% versus IEFA's 0.07%.
Volatility and Holdings: IEFA holds more stocks (2,600) and has a lower beta, indicating less volatility, while SCHF has a more concentrated portfolio with 1,501 companies, focusing on broad diversification.
Sector Exposure: Both ETFs have significant exposure to financial services (22-24%) and similar top holdings, including ASML and Roche, but differ in their sector allocations, with SCHF leaning more towards technology.
Investment Appeal: Both funds are suitable for investors seeking international exposure, but SCHF may attract those focused on lower costs and higher income, while IEFA offers broader market coverage.

Investment Strategy Shift: The author has reduced their investment in U.S. stocks in favor of international markets, despite the S&P 500's 17% increase in 2025.
Performance of Non-U.S. Markets: Data indicates that investing in non-U.S. markets has yielded significantly higher returns compared to U.S. stocks this year.
52-Week Range Analysis: IEFA's share price has a 52-week low of $66.95 and a high of $89.98, with the last trade recorded at $88.44.
Understanding ETFs: Exchange traded funds (ETFs) function like stocks, where investors buy and sell "units" that can be created or destroyed based on demand.
Monitoring ETF Flows: Weekly monitoring of shares outstanding helps identify ETFs with significant inflows (new units created) or outflows (units destroyed), impacting the underlying holdings.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent Nasdaq, Inc.
ETF Inflows Overview: The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF saw the largest inflow with an addition of 15 million units, marking a 0.8% increase week over week.
Performance of Underlying Components: In morning trading, Spotify Technology and Sea, significant components of the IEFA ETF, experienced declines of approximately 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively.
Percentage Change in Inflows: The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income Fund had the highest percentage increase in inflows, adding 20,000 units, which represents a 40.0% rise in outstanding units.
Market Activity: The SPDR Select Sector Fund - Health Care, a major component of the XLVI ETF, saw a slight increase of about 0.2% in morning trading.

Comparison of ETFs: The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) focuses on developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada, while the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) includes both developed and emerging markets, with IEFA having a slightly higher expense ratio and dividend yield.
Sector Allocation and Holdings: IEFA's portfolio is concentrated in Financial Services, Industrials, and Healthcare, with top holdings like ASML and Nestlé, whereas VEU has a broader sector reach with significant investments in Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, and Alibaba.
Performance and Returns: Since 2012, both ETFs have shown similar total returns, with IEFA rising 162% and VEU 142%, and they share several top holdings, indicating a comparable investment profile.
Dividend Growth: IEFA has outperformed VEU in terms of dividend growth, with a 10.5% annual increase over the last five years compared to VEU's 8.6%, making IEFA potentially more attractive for income-focused investors.








