Halliburton Analysts Trim Forecasts After Softer 2025 Guidance
Analyst Revisions: Following Halliburton's mixed fourth-quarter results and weak guidance, several analysts lowered their price targets, with Stifel reducing it from $42 to $37 and Goldman Sachs from $36 to $34, while maintaining Buy ratings. Analysts noted challenges such as international revenue headwinds and pricing concessions affecting margins.
Long-term Outlook: Despite the short-term challenges, analysts remain optimistic about Halliburton's long-term growth potential due to its strong product portfolio, service quality, technology focus, and robust free cash flow, which is expected to support shareholder returns.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on OIH

No data
About the author

- Market Opportunities: Investors may find renewed opportunities in previously recommended stocks from healthcare, oil services, and consumer staples sectors.
- Signs of Momentum: These stocks are showing signs of renewed momentum, suggesting potential upside for investors.
- Sector Rotation: The leadership in these sectors has already rotated, indicating a shift in market dynamics.
- Investor Consideration: Investors are encouraged to take a fresh look at these stocks as they may present attractive investment options.
- Energy Sector Performance: The energy sector has underperformed over the past year, ranking ninth out of eleven major sectors.
- State Street ETF Ranking: The State Street Energy Select Sector ETF reflects this lagging performance within the broader market context.

U.S. Military Action: Escalating military actions by the U.S. against Venezuela are influencing global oil markets.
Impact on Oil Prices: The potential for regime change in Venezuela is leading investors to raise oil prices, anticipating access to significant oil reserves.

J.P. Morgan's Upgrade: Helmerich & Payne (HP) received an upgrade to Overweight from Neutral by J.P. Morgan, which anticipates a rebound in Saudi Arabian activity and sees potential for the stock to outperform due to attractive valuations and earnings growth prospects.
Cautious Sector Outlook: Despite the upgrade, J.P. Morgan maintains a cautious stance on the oilfield services sector, highlighting headwinds such as declining capital intensity in North America and a weakening spending picture, which may affect overall performance in 2026.
Stock Selection Importance: Analysts emphasize the importance of stock selection in a challenging macro environment, with companies demonstrating earnings resiliency being better positioned for relative share price performance amid anticipated market loosening.
Mixed Prospects for Offshore Drillers: J.P. Morgan downgraded several offshore drilling stocks due to potential earnings risks and full valuations, while upgrading Liberty Energy and ProPetro as beneficiaries of the growing demand for modular power solutions.

Energy Sector Performance: The energy sector is experiencing a resurgence, with exploration and production stocks beginning to align with equipment stocks.
Leading ETFs: The VanEck Oil Services ETF is leading the sector with an 8% year-to-date increase, followed by the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF at 6%.
Exploration & Production ETF: The State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF has seen a modest increase of 2% this year.
Market Trends: Overall, the performance of these ETFs indicates a positive trend in the energy market, particularly in oil services and exploration sectors.
VanEck Oil Service ETF Performance: The VanEck Oil Service ETF is up approximately 1.4% on Monday, with notable gains from Noble (up 2.9%) and Liberty Energy (up 2.8%).
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF Performance: The Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF is down about 3.2%, with Bakkt Holdings declining by 12.8% and Strategy falling by 10.6%.
Market Overview: The trading day highlights a contrast in performance between the oil service sector and data sharing sector ETFs.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Nasdaq, Inc.








