Pan American Silver Corp falls as silver prices decline amid market turmoil
Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS) saw a significant decline of 7.20% as it crossed below its 5-day SMA, reflecting the broader struggles in the precious metals market.
The recent turmoil in the silver market, highlighted by a 19% crash in March 2026 silver futures, has led to a strong sell-off, impacting investor confidence. This decline in silver prices, coupled with a 1.75% drop in the Nasdaq-100 and a 0.48% decrease in the S&P 500, indicates a sector rotation affecting silver mining stocks like PAAS, despite some positive sentiment in the retail sector for silver ETFs.
As the market continues to grapple with volatility and uncertainty, investors in Pan American Silver Corp may need to reassess their positions, particularly in light of the ongoing challenges in the precious metals sector.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on PAAS
About PAAS
About the author

- Gold Price Decline: Spot gold fell over 1% to $4,899.8 per ounce, reflecting market uncertainty about future trends, which may lead investors to reassess their asset allocation strategies.
- Silver Futures Surge: March 2026 silver futures rose approximately 62% to $85.1 per ounce, indicating strong market demand for silver, particularly after price corrections that attracted significant speculative capital.
- Zhongcai Futures Profitability: According to the Financial Times, Zhongcai Futures earned over $500 million during the silver rout, demonstrating its successful establishment of large short positions amidst market volatility, thereby solidifying its position in the industry.
- Market Sentiment Shift: Despite declines in silver mining stocks like First Majestic and Hecla Mining by over 2%, retail sentiment for iShares Silver Trust and SPDR Gold Shares ETF remains in the 'extremely bullish' territory, indicating strong investor confidence in future market performance.
- Gold Futures Rebound: March 2026 gold futures surged 5.9% to $4,912 per ounce, indicating a recovery in market sentiment after a three-day decline, with expectations of further increases to $7,500 in the future.
- Silver Futures Surge: March 2026 silver futures jumped 12.8% to $86.8 per ounce, reflecting a reassessment of prices by investors, with potential for silver to reach $300 by summer 2026.
- Market Sentiment Reset: Analyst Peter Fertig noted that the market was oversold following Trump's nomination of a new Fed chair, and the current rebound is attracting profit-taking investors back into the market, highlighting strong demand for precious metals.
- Mining Stocks Rise: The rebound in precious metal prices lifted shares of silver miners like First Majestic and Hecla Mining by around 5%, while gold miners Newmont and Barrick Gold saw increases of 4% and 5%, respectively, indicating optimistic sentiment towards mining stocks.
- Cost and Volatility Comparison: The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while the iShares Gold Trust (IAU) charges only 0.25%, making IAU more appealing to cost-conscious investors; additionally, SIL exhibits higher volatility with a beta of 1.42, indicating significant price swings compared to the S&P 500.
- Return and Risk Assessment: As of January 30, 2026, SIL's one-year return stands at 167.4%, compared to IAU's 72.9%, suggesting higher potential returns for SIL, but its maximum drawdown of -55.63% highlights greater risk, necessitating careful consideration of risk versus reward by investors.
- Portfolio Composition: SIL exclusively invests in silver mining companies, holding 41 firms including Wheaton Precious Metals and Pan American Silver, which makes its performance susceptible to individual company factors, whereas IAU directly tracks gold prices, offering more stable investment returns.
- Market Liquidity and Investment Strategy: IAU boasts $79.7 billion in assets under management, representing a highly liquid way to invest in gold, while SIL's $6.3 billion in assets indicates lower liquidity, prompting investors to consider their investment goals and risk tolerance when making choices.
- Significant Performance Improvement: In Q3 2025, Hecla Mining's sales surged by 67% year-over-year, propelling earnings per share from break-even last year to $0.15, demonstrating the positive impact of rising precious metal prices amid increasing geopolitical and economic uncertainty.
- Revenue Structure Analysis: In Q3 2025, silver accounted for 48% of Hecla's total revenue, with gold at 37%, and lead and zinc making up the remainder, indicating the company's heavy reliance on precious metals, where future price fluctuations will directly affect its financial health.
- Stable Dividend Policy: Despite improved financial results, Hecla's annual dividend remains at $0.015 per share, as management prioritizes debt repayment and reinvestment in the business, a capital allocation decision that may impact investor return expectations.
- Market Volatility Risks: Given the recent pullback in precious metal prices, investors should not expect significant dividends from Hecla Mining, especially in a highly volatile market, suggesting that those seeking stable dividends may need to look elsewhere.
- Gold Futures Decline: March 2026 gold futures fell 1% to $4,717 per ounce, reflecting increasing selling pressure in the precious metals market, despite JPMorgan's forecast of gold prices reaching $6,300 by year-end, indicating potential future demand.
- Silver Futures Rise: Although spot silver prices plummeted over 26% on Friday, March 2026 silver futures gained 2.7% to $80.6 per ounce, suggesting persistent demand for silver that may attract investors back into the market.
- Dollar Index Rises: The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) increased by 0.1% to 97.3 in pre-market trading, indicating the dollar's strength is exerting pressure on the precious metals market, prompting investors to reassess their asset allocations.
- ETF Performance Declines: The iShares Silver Trust (SLV) slid to its lowest level since January 9 in pre-market trading, with Friday's sell-off wiping out its year-to-date gains from around 80% to approximately 30%, reflecting a dramatic shift in market sentiment.
- Fee Structure Comparison: SLV charges a lower expense ratio than SIL, indicating that SLV is more cost-effective as an ETF tracking physical silver prices, while SIL's higher costs reflect its investment in 39 global silver mining companies, despite offering dividend income.
- Portfolio Composition: SIL focuses on silver mining companies within the basic materials sector, with major holdings including Wheaton Precious Metals and Pan American Silver, meaning its performance is influenced by both silver prices and company-specific factors.
- Performance Discrepancy: Over the past five years, SLV has outperformed SIL with a $1,000 investment return and a smaller maximum drawdown, showcasing SLV's advantages in risk management.
- Investment Strategy Choice: Opting for SLV suits investors looking for direct exposure to silver prices, while SIL appeals to those seeking higher potential returns through silver mining companies, albeit with greater associated risks.











