HOLT's Michel Lerner Predicts That Only a Handful of AI Stocks Will Thrive in 20 Years
Long-term Success of AI Companies: Michel Lerner from UBS predicts that only 2 out of 10 AI companies will succeed in the long term, emphasizing the need for robust business models amidst high market expectations and extreme stock valuations reminiscent of the dot-com era.
Investment Selectivity: Historical data suggests that investors should be highly selective when investing in AI, as only a small fraction of current value creators will remain successful over the next 20 years, highlighting a significant divergence between successful and unsuccessful AI investments.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on AIEQ
About the author
Wells Fargo's Leading AI Capital Expenditure Stocks for Small and Mid-Cap Companies According to SA Quant
Wells Fargo AI Capital Expenditure Beneficiaries: Wells Fargo's selected small- and mid-cap AI capital expenditure beneficiaries have seen an 11.7% increase over three months, with projected AI capex expected to exceed $570 billion next year.
Top Performing Stocks: The list includes companies like Seagate Technology, Bloom Energy, and Celestica, all rated as strong buys with significant year-to-date performance, indicating strong market confidence in their growth potential.
SA Quant Ratings: Stocks are evaluated using Seeking Alpha's Quant metrics, which assess valuation, growth, profitability, and momentum, with ratings above 3.5 considered bullish and below 2.5 bearish.
Diverse Stock Performance: The performance of various companies ranges widely, with some stocks like Sandisk Corp. showing exceptional returns, while others maintain hold ratings, reflecting a mixed outlook in the AI and tech sectors.
AI Investments Are 'Justified' and 'Sustainable' If Companies Experience Significant Productivity Gains, According to GS
AI Investment Growth: Goldman Sachs projects AI-related spending will reach around $300B by 2025, driven by major investments from tech companies like OpenAI, Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom, despite concerns about sustainability.
Economic Impact and Productivity Gains: The economic value of generative AI in the U.S. is estimated at $20T, with potential productivity gains of 15-30% following full AI adoption, although current AI applications are still limited.
Sustainability of Investments: Current AI investments in the U.S. are below 1% of GDP, which is considered justifiable given the potential economic returns, but there are concerns about the timing of infrastructure build versus revenue realization.
Future of AI Development: Continued investment in AI is expected to be driven by the belief in capturing first-mover advantages and improving model performance, with the potential for significant profits from advancements like AGI.
How an AI 'land grab' climate is driving stock valuations into a frenzy
AI Market Frenzy: Karen Finerman, CEO of Metropolitan Capital Advisors, describes the current AI sector as "frenetic," expressing concerns over stock valuations in a competitive "land grab" environment, while acknowledging AI's long-term potential.
Valuation Perspectives: Finerman notes that her understanding of investment value has evolved, citing companies like Nvidia and Netflix as examples where high valuations may be justified by their performance.
Comparison to Dot-Com Bubble: While drawing parallels to the dot-com bubble, Finerman emphasizes that the current market is not as excessively priced, leading her to reduce her exposure to AI investments.
Preference for Bitcoin: In the broader economic context, Finerman favors Bitcoin over gold, attributing its appeal to concerns about fiscal deficits and currency devaluation, especially under a pro-crypto administration.
Could AI Capital Expenditure Lead to a U.S. Economic Downturn? – TS Lombard’s Dario Perkins
Impact of AI Investments on the Economy: Dario Perkins, an economist, suggests that the U.S. economy may have entered a recession without the substantial AI investments from Big Tech, which have led to a significant increase in data center capital expenditures despite weak consumer spending and employment.
Misleading GDP Contributions: Perkins argues that while AI investments contribute to GDP growth, much of the capital equipment is imported, leading to a negative offset in other economic areas, and cautions against comparing the current AI boom to the housing bubble of the early 2000s, emphasizing the need to differentiate between genuine bubbles and long-term trends.
Bessemer Venture Partners: AI Valuations Differ from Dotcom Bubble Due to Robust Revenue Growth
AI Investment vs. Dot-Com Bubble: Byron Deeter of Bessemer Venture Partners argues that current AI investment levels are fundamentally different from the dot-com bubble due to unprecedented revenue growth in companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.
AI's Impact on Employment: Deeter views AI as a driver of efficiency and job creation, suggesting that the transition will lead to higher-value jobs, similar to past industrial revolutions.
Market Potential: He believes the market size for AI could surpass traditional software markets, indicating a significant increase in potential revenue.
Technological Advancements: Deeter highlights ongoing innovations in AI, particularly in power efficiency, predicting dramatic improvements in price and performance across the industry.
Firms Embrace 'Invest in AI Now, Consider ROI Later' Approach – Insights from Susquehanna's Mehdi Hosseini
AI Investment Trends: Mehdi Hosseini from Susquehanna notes a shift in AI investment strategies, with companies prioritizing spending over immediate ROI assessments, pushing ROI questions to 2027 instead of 2026.
Market Dynamics: The current AI boom is characterized by major tech companies like NVIDIA and AMD as primary buyers, creating unique supply chain dynamics, while Hosseini sees potential for memory manufacturer Micron due to tight supply and advanced DRAM needs.
Vendor Financing Risks: Hosseini expresses concerns about the emerging vendor financing model in the AI sector, likening it to past issues in the solar industry, but believes any downturn has been postponed as companies spend first and evaluate ROI later.
Future Projections: Despite risks, Hosseini projects significant growth for Micron Technology, potentially reaching $200 per share, and highlights Goldman Sachs' prediction of GDP growth acceleration due to AI productivity.
Wells Fargo's Leading AI Capital Expenditure Stocks for Small and Mid-Cap Companies According to SA Quant
Wells Fargo AI Capital Expenditure Beneficiaries: Wells Fargo's selected small- and mid-cap AI capital expenditure beneficiaries have seen an 11.7% increase over three months, with projected AI capex expected to exceed $570 billion next year.
Top Performing Stocks: The list includes companies like Seagate Technology, Bloom Energy, and Celestica, all rated as strong buys with significant year-to-date performance, indicating strong market confidence in their growth potential.
SA Quant Ratings: Stocks are evaluated using Seeking Alpha's Quant metrics, which assess valuation, growth, profitability, and momentum, with ratings above 3.5 considered bullish and below 2.5 bearish.
Diverse Stock Performance: The performance of various companies ranges widely, with some stocks like Sandisk Corp. showing exceptional returns, while others maintain hold ratings, reflecting a mixed outlook in the AI and tech sectors.
AI Investments Are 'Justified' and 'Sustainable' If Companies Experience Significant Productivity Gains, According to GS
AI Investment Growth: Goldman Sachs projects AI-related spending will reach around $300B by 2025, driven by major investments from tech companies like OpenAI, Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom, despite concerns about sustainability.
Economic Impact and Productivity Gains: The economic value of generative AI in the U.S. is estimated at $20T, with potential productivity gains of 15-30% following full AI adoption, although current AI applications are still limited.
Sustainability of Investments: Current AI investments in the U.S. are below 1% of GDP, which is considered justifiable given the potential economic returns, but there are concerns about the timing of infrastructure build versus revenue realization.
Future of AI Development: Continued investment in AI is expected to be driven by the belief in capturing first-mover advantages and improving model performance, with the potential for significant profits from advancements like AGI.
How an AI 'land grab' climate is driving stock valuations into a frenzy
AI Market Frenzy: Karen Finerman, CEO of Metropolitan Capital Advisors, describes the current AI sector as "frenetic," expressing concerns over stock valuations in a competitive "land grab" environment, while acknowledging AI's long-term potential.
Valuation Perspectives: Finerman notes that her understanding of investment value has evolved, citing companies like Nvidia and Netflix as examples where high valuations may be justified by their performance.
Comparison to Dot-Com Bubble: While drawing parallels to the dot-com bubble, Finerman emphasizes that the current market is not as excessively priced, leading her to reduce her exposure to AI investments.
Preference for Bitcoin: In the broader economic context, Finerman favors Bitcoin over gold, attributing its appeal to concerns about fiscal deficits and currency devaluation, especially under a pro-crypto administration.
Could AI Capital Expenditure Lead to a U.S. Economic Downturn? – TS Lombard’s Dario Perkins
Impact of AI Investments on the Economy: Dario Perkins, an economist, suggests that the U.S. economy may have entered a recession without the substantial AI investments from Big Tech, which have led to a significant increase in data center capital expenditures despite weak consumer spending and employment.
Misleading GDP Contributions: Perkins argues that while AI investments contribute to GDP growth, much of the capital equipment is imported, leading to a negative offset in other economic areas, and cautions against comparing the current AI boom to the housing bubble of the early 2000s, emphasizing the need to differentiate between genuine bubbles and long-term trends.
Bessemer Venture Partners: AI Valuations Differ from Dotcom Bubble Due to Robust Revenue Growth
AI Investment vs. Dot-Com Bubble: Byron Deeter of Bessemer Venture Partners argues that current AI investment levels are fundamentally different from the dot-com bubble due to unprecedented revenue growth in companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.
AI's Impact on Employment: Deeter views AI as a driver of efficiency and job creation, suggesting that the transition will lead to higher-value jobs, similar to past industrial revolutions.
Market Potential: He believes the market size for AI could surpass traditional software markets, indicating a significant increase in potential revenue.
Technological Advancements: Deeter highlights ongoing innovations in AI, particularly in power efficiency, predicting dramatic improvements in price and performance across the industry.
Firms Embrace 'Invest in AI Now, Consider ROI Later' Approach – Insights from Susquehanna's Mehdi Hosseini
AI Investment Trends: Mehdi Hosseini from Susquehanna notes a shift in AI investment strategies, with companies prioritizing spending over immediate ROI assessments, pushing ROI questions to 2027 instead of 2026.
Market Dynamics: The current AI boom is characterized by major tech companies like NVIDIA and AMD as primary buyers, creating unique supply chain dynamics, while Hosseini sees potential for memory manufacturer Micron due to tight supply and advanced DRAM needs.
Vendor Financing Risks: Hosseini expresses concerns about the emerging vendor financing model in the AI sector, likening it to past issues in the solar industry, but believes any downturn has been postponed as companies spend first and evaluate ROI later.
Future Projections: Despite risks, Hosseini projects significant growth for Micron Technology, potentially reaching $200 per share, and highlights Goldman Sachs' prediction of GDP growth acceleration due to AI productivity.
